|
CARLA-RAE INTERVIEW By Administrator Nadine Krause of Official Carla-Rae Fan Club sites on Face book and Myspace |
|
CARLA-RAE INTERVIEW: By Administrator Nadine Krause of both the Face book and MySpace Official Carla-Rae Fan clubs:
Interview Carla-Rae
Nadine: Hey Carla. Thanks for making time for me. How are you today? Carla: I am doing quite well. Thankful for a great holiday time with my family. Thanks for asking.
Nadine: That’s nice to hear. So, let’s start with our first question. What some people really want to know is this: When did you decide to become an actress? Has it always been your dream job, or did you want to do something else entirely? Carla: Truthfully, I believe I have always wanted to be an actor. When I was very young I would stand in front of the bathroom mirror and do different facial expressions. I would sing and I would make different voices. I did plays all throughout my school years, but it was actually in high school, doing those plays, that I really, totally, fell in love with the art of acting. Later going on to study acting in college.
Nadine: Sounds really great. You do a great job. How much time do you invest in your job? Does it fill out the whole day or do you have some time for yourself? Carla: My day starts by going through what are called “breakdowns”. They are listings of castings that are available in different locations in the country. Through my managing agent or my talent agent or on my own submissions are made for audition opportunities. Depending on how many breakdowns actually fit my demographic will determine the time spent on that part of my day. Staying in touch with my agents and manager is always an important part of my networking process, as they will hear of things that I may never know about because they have more in depth contact with the casting community. Then there is always spending time working on audition pieces like scenes and monologues to be ready when an audition does come up.
Nadine: How do you prepare for auditions? Carla: I keep monologues and scenes fresh by practicing them on tape, video and audio. To see how it looks and sounds in order to be prepared for the best presentation when the opportunity arrives. When I am given a particular piece of script to prepare, I think of how the character might feel or think during that particular scene. I usually have a reader to read the other dialog in the scene and then we put them on video to prepare for submission.
Nadine: Oh yeah, that's good. When I was in plays, we also always recorded ourselves, so we could see what we can improve. So question number four. Did Linn Productions think about a sequel to Imprint? The movie seemed to be pretty acclaimed around your fans and others, so it would be a good opportunity, don’t you think? Carla: That is a question that would be best answered by Linn Productions. I do know that fans have asked if a sequel will take place.
Nadine: Okay, I think I will get in touch with Linn Productions then. Thank you. What are your future goals? Carla: I am determined and confident that more roles will present themselves for me to work on, whether in Film, TV or stage. I am also, working on a music CD and a book. I always look forward to what the future holds and want to be prepared to be the best I can be. I am grateful for my management team and what 2010 has in store for all of us.
Nadine: You are working on a Music CD and a book? That sounds good. It should be hard to combine family life with a career, isn’t it? Like when you make a movie you are often out of town Carla: Truthfully, I have been blessed with a family who supports me in the work I have chosen to do. So, though some projects do, in fact, take me away from my family for periods of time, I have their blessing and we are always just a phone call away. When I am not on set, I make sure I have checked in with my husband at least once per day if not more. My family is important to me, as I am to them, so we keep in touch daily.
Nadine: It’s wonderful, that your family supports you that much. How do you like giving interviews? It is easier to sit in front of the interview partner or to make an interview through a phone? Carla: Actually, I never know what an interviewer is going to ask, so whether I am on the phone or in front of my interviewer the questions are fresh and I have to be on point.
Nadine: I can very well imagine…I would be very nervous, too. As we know you speak Native American in some movies, we want to know if you learned it before doing those scenes, or do you know the language as well? Carla: The Native American Indian languages I have spoken in films and TV, I have had to learn prior to and sometimes on the set of the project. I have spoken Lenape’, Cherokee, and Lakota for films and TV roles.
Nadine: It's great when someone speaks several languages. You have my respect. You shot Imprint in Pine Ridge. How do you think about the situation of the people there? And what did you feel when you saw the distress? Carla: I had been to Pine Ridge prior to ever filming “Imprint”. Therefore, I was already aware of some of the problems the people of Pine Ridge face. Though I do not have all the answers, whenever, a situation arises that I can be of help, I try to roll up my sleeves and help where I can.
Nadine: In October, there was the Reaper Award where Imprint got nominated as “Best Ghost Story”. You said you where very nervous because you also walked over the “red carpet”. What did you feel as you walked over it and all of the reporters took photos of you? Carla: I wasn’t so much nervous as I was uncertain of what to expect and what questions would be asked of me. Thankfully, the Linn’s went ahead of Tonantzin and myself and prepared the way, by fielding production questions that we may never have been able to answer.
Nadine: That sounds nice. What was the first thing you thought as you walked over the Red Carpet? Carla: WOW! It’s short. *smiles* ( The Red Carpet is actually shorter than you might think.) And then, WOW! What an honor.
Nadine: Really? He always looks a lot longer, than he really is? Optical illusion! *smiles* What is your biggest wish for 2010? Carla: It is my hope that doors will open for quality roles in Film, TV and stage that I will be able to fit into to showcase my God-Given gifts and talents, AND, that these gifts and talents will be a source of enlightenment to the people who view them.
Nadine: I know that the entire fan club is behind you now and we would like to see more often in TV, film and on stage. So and last but not Least : What do you want to say to your fans? Carla:: To my fans world wide, YOU ROCK!! I am so honored and humbled by such an awesome group of people who support, encourage and pray for me, my career and who care enough to ask about my family’s well being. It is my hope that my work will be a blessing and honor to you for all your love and support. PEACE.
Nadine: Thank you, that you have taken your time and therefore I wish you a good start into the new year.
|
|
|
Indian Country Today/WE SHALL REMAIN |
Indians get look at 'We Shall Remain'
By Victor Morales, Today correspondent
Story Published: Mar 20, 2009
Story Updated: Mar 20, 2009
PALM SPRINGS, Calif. – The front rows were occupied by Native film heavyweights Chris Eyre (the director of “Smoke Signals”) and actor Wes Studi.
Dennis Banks of the American Indian Movementwaited alone in the back rows. The theater was almost filled to capacity with many Natives from as far away as Washington and Oklahoma. Before them was a white man, Thomas Ethan Harris who readied the audience by declaring the forthcoming film to be “about one of the most tragic events” in American Indian history. They listened silently to Harris, the man responsible for bringing the film and 11 others to the Festival of Native Film and Culture that was supposed to highlight their stories, their perspective.
As the film closed and as some non-Natives left, the Indians remained in their seats to discuss the film that many in Indian country are anticipating. “Trail of Tears,” one of five films in the “We Shall Remain” series premiered at the five-day festival March 7, a month before its scheduled airing on the PBS documentary program “American Experience.” And from the comments made, it appears the film will receive high marks from Indians as it evoked everything from anger, sadness and vindication.
“If this film doesn’t cause a rewrite of American history, then what will,” Banks said.
“Trail of Tears” included lesser known details of the Cherokee Nation on the eve of their forced removal from original lands that made their nightmare – more than 4,000 people died in the march to Oklahoma – seem even more appalling. The extent of assimilation to American culture is vivid and their broken hearts felt when confronted by America’s betrayal.
“I thought I knew about the Trail of Tears until I got into the research,” said Eyre, the director of the series. He wasn’t the only one. One man said he was surprised to learn that class distinctions existed among the 19th century Cherokee. Another man, a member of the Cherokee Nation living in southern California, said it succinctly by commenting that it helped explain his history.
The film’s attempt to rectify or plug up a historical void was just one facet apparent to Indian viewers. The dramatic re-enactments, scenes weaved into sequences of historical images, documents and maps, were authentic to many. Eyre said he consulted with a number of tribal Cherokee elders in the making of the episode.
The film incorporates the tribe’s language and used a Cherokee actor (Studi) to play Major Ridge, a prominent figure in 19th century Cherokee history. Studi said his first cinematic role as a Cherokee was a “great experience” after a famous career known for playing a Pawnee war chief in “Dances with Wolves,” a Huron spy in “The Last of the Mohicans” and the Apache holdout in “Geronimo.”
Gale Gaddy, a Cherokee man, said that although the Cherokee language in the film was discernable because he was used to hearing it in “song or hymn,” he realized he had never heard it the way Studi and the other actors spoke it in the film.
“And to hear it like my grandparents and community spoke it; it was beautiful.”
Cinematically, the film also moved the audience with its sweeping aerials of Cherokee country, past and present, throughout the seasons.
But the majority of the comments remained with the film’s implications for the presentation of history.
“I was never taught this side of history,” said one high school student. Studi said the film series should have its rightful place in schools.
Banks said the timing of the film was just as important as its historical significance, explaining that today’s more holistic approach in education and academia could make a difference.
“After 40 years of (AIM activism) and 20 years before that you had Indian films, but that’s all that it was. The process has been long.”
The series, which spans 300 years, was created with the caveat of presenting it from a Native American perspective, according to its producers at WGBH Public Television in Boston.
Patricia Schoolcraft, Cahuilla, said she recognized immediately that it was formed with Native hands.
“It was the way that they had told the story. It wasn’t one particular thing. It was more or less the whole thing.”
According to Harris, the festival’s programmer and consultant, the event’s objective was to showcase films created with an aboriginal lens.
“Most of the movies (with Native Americans) come from the point of view of white men,” he said.
Dawn Howard, who is Asian said she got the “feel of the Native culture. From the three movies that I watched I feel like they’ve been missing a lot of their culture and they are doing what it takes to make sure it’s known.”
The festival presented several genres of Native cinema, including dramatic feature, documentary, short film and international (Canada and Australia). This was the festival’s eighth run, it was attended by 42 percent more than last year with a combined attendance of 2,000, said Michael Hammond, the director of the Agua Caliente Cultural Museum, which organized the festival.
“We Shall Remain” is scheduled to air April 13 beginning with the story of the Wampanoag in the 1600s. It ends with a profile on Indian activists of the 1970s.
|
|
Chris Eyre’s latest production, Imprint, is not an “Indian” movie.
Yes, it does take place on a reservation and includes Native cultural and religious references. Yes, it does have Indians playing Indians and the conflicts facing contemporary Natives. It has all those things. But Imprint is not an “Indian” movie.At least, not by conventional thinking. And that’s to Eyre’s and director Michael Linn’s credit, as they have redefined what we’ve come to expect of a film depicting Native America and in this case, women in Native America.
 Starring Tonantzin Carmelo, the film is a suspense thriller in the Hitchcock mold—otherworldly forces, evil in disguise, and regret leading to redemption. Most significantly, Imprint’s biggest imprint is its portrayal of women; neither victims nor backdrops, they are the force and soul of the entire story.
Yet, while conveying a women’s perspective, the plot never succumbs to becoming a “chick flick.”The film opens in a Denver courtroom with prosecuting attorney Shayla Stonefeather’s (Carmelo) successful murder conviction of a Lakota boy from Pine Ridge—her childhood home. Emotionally wrung by the high-profile trial, she escapes by going back to the reservation to visit her mother and dying father.
Carmelo is smartly cast as the earnest young woman driven to succeed only to begin questioning the price of her quest. She’s determined, she’s attractive, and the girl takes crap from nobody—nobody, that is, except her smarmy white boyfriend (Cory Brusseau) whose bald ambition is his eventual undoing. Impressively, Carmelo appears in every frame in the film.This is Shayla’s story; with Lakota mysticism providing the dramatic hook.
If home is where the heart is, then Shayla’s heart needs resuscitation. Her dad is withering before her eyes; the folks she grew up with have spray-painted her car with the word “apple,” an epithet describing Natives who’ve morphed into whiteness at the expense of their own identity. Even her mother (Carla-Rae Holland) is questioning her loyalties. “What happened,” she asks, “to the little girl that wanted to come back and help her people?”
Holland and Carmelo seamlessly coalesce as mom and daughter. Both actresses comfortably use body language—head nods, gestures, knowing glances—creating a distinct non-verbal dialect all families have. It works. And it’s the scenes between these two, more than the hair-raising arc, which lift the plot from a pedestrian thriller to a thoughtful drama.
Of course, we can't forget the men. Considering Eyre and the writing team of Linn and Keith Davenport are all males, it’s curious how they depict their fellow fellows. Imprint’s males are a sorry bunch indeed—a killer, sad sack, side kick, victim, and loser. Take your pick.  Michael Spears, as Tom, is the studly reservation cop who Shayla discarded when she followed the bright lights to the big city. His stalwart character is relegated to the background; but honestly you won’t care all that much.Clearly, Tom is no match for her spirited, independent nature.Worse is Shayla’s boyfriend Jonathan. He’s a self-serving, yuppie jerk—albeit too predictably so. How much more interesting if his character was something other than the stereotypical white politico; maybe African American, Latino, or even Native. Now that would challenge our perceptions of a self-serving, yuppie jerk! Despite these few shortcomings, Imprint succeeds.Shayla eventually finds her way back, spiritually and literally; providing a kind word and sandwich for the beggar she would have stepped over only weeks before. Her mother defines perseverance; her wayward brother, played by Tokala Clifford, is seen only in glimpses. Nevertheless, all three are people you wouldn’t mind getting to know better. The film calls for a sequel, even a series—Carmelo’s heroine would be a refreshing antidote to the vacuous Barbie doll celebrities girls have as contemporary role models.
Imprint stamps an indelible new mark. Because this film, above all else, is for the girls.Thanks to a couple of guys—Chris Eyre and Michael Linn—who appreciate that there’s a lot more to women of any ethnicity than being relegated to a “chick flick.”
|
Native Actress Spotlight Carla-Rae Holland Carla does a fine job as Tonantzin's mother in "Imprint" she nearly steals the movie all to herself. A new find ladies and gentleman. Click on the picture for all things Carla. Rosco Pond Modern Native |
|
IMPRINT MAKES AN IMPRESSION |
Imprint Makes an Impression Supernatural Mystery Showcases Modern Natives By Rob Schmidt 5/21/2007 The setting was the Zanuck Theater on the Fox Studios lot in West Los Angeles. The scene was the premiere of an independent Native-themed thriller, Imprint. The mood was expectant. Writer/director Michael Linn was present along with his whole clan. Other notables included producer Chris Eyre, Mark Reed of American Indians in Film and Television, and James Lujan of Intertribal Entertainment. Also present were 40 or 50 students from the Sherman Indian School in Riverside, who had raised the money to travel to the screening. I settled in to watch the spooky show. Eighty-eight minutes and one reel change later, I was impressed. Imprint tells the story of Shayla Stonefeather (Tonantzin Carmelo), a young Lakota prosecutor working in Denver. She’s just convicted Robbie White Shirt of murder, though his supporters insist he’s innocent. Worn out, she returns to Pine Ridge for her father’s birthday. A herd of buffalo welcomes her home. But things aren’t any better on the rez. Her father (Charlie White Buffalo) is dying and won’t respond to her. Her mother (Carla-Rae Holland) is giving up and selling the family herd. Her drug-using brother has been missing for two years. Her white boyfriend (Cory Brusseau) is pressuring her to come home. And she’s seeing and hearing things that go bump in the night—things no one else notices. The tension slowly builds as Shayla tries to discern who, if anyone, is watching her. Is it White Shirt’s brother Frank out for revenge? Is it her long-lost brother? Or is it only her imagination? And does her blank-faced father know something he’s not saying? Variety’s March 28 review summed it up well: “A shrewdly moody attempt at an old-fashioned ghost story with a Native American twist, ‘Imprint’ generates a respectable amount of suspense without resorting to either cheap shocks or splashy f/x.” Imprint doesn’t look or feel like an indie film. Led by Carmelo, who is on-screen most of the time, the cast is generally topnotch. The cinematography is often gorgeous, with stunning shots of Shayla riding on horseback across the stark plains. The music and sound effects hit the right notes without resorting to flutes or drums. No noble savages Best of all, the movie seamlessly integrates a modern-day story with a traditional culture. With her stylish car, laptop, and cellphone, Shayla is one of us. Like many young adults, she’s a bit removed from her roots. But she’s still one of “them” too. She helps her mother care for her father, renews her acquaintance with the family steed, and recalls her Lakota tongue almost effortlessly. In other words, she’s not your typical angry Indian who scorns the people and places she’s left behind. She has differences with the others, but none so serious that she can’t bridge them. As her mother, officer Tom (Michael Spears), and a medicine man remind her of her Lakota heritage, she eventually gets the message. As Variety put it, “Carmelo sustains sympathy and interest as she subtly shades a familiar stereotype—a disillusioned skeptic who re-embraces her ancestral culture—with enough specificity to resemble a flesh-and-blood human being.” But the eerie sights and sounds propel the story. Again, this is a ghost story, not a rez-based social study. There are no shots of broken-down trailers or drunks sprawled on doorsteps. Pine Ridge’s problems lurk in the background, but they don’t intrude on Shayla’s growing apprehension. It’s the kind of storytelling Native movies should do more often. Instead of spoonfeeding lessons like medicine, fill audiences with an irresistible story. Let them learn about Indians in passing while they relish a mystery or romance or adventure....
|
|
|